Rosa Feola, Gyula Orendt - Le nozze di Figaro - Glyndebourne - photo Robbie Jack |
Reviewed by Robert Hugill on Jul 3 2016
Star rating:
Beautiful to look at, vividly engaging, Michael Grandage's 1960s set production
Golda Schultz - Le nozze di Figaro Glyndebourne - photo Robbie Jack |
In an article in the programme book Michael Grandage explained that the 1960's setting for the production came about partly because they were looking for a suitable milieu in which it would be possible for the Countess and Susanna to convincingly swap clothes. Peter Schlesinger's photographs of the beautiful people of the late 1960's provided the inspiration. Another given was the intention to have the action set just in the single day specified in the libretto, so Christopher Oram's designs pair a massive, ancient-looking Moorish palace on a revolve with 1960s people, the whole flowing beautifully from the opening when the Count and Countess arrive early morning during the overture, to the finale in the darkened garden.
I had seen the production when new, when it came to the BBC Proms and also caught it on television, but this was the first time that I had seen it at Glyndebourne. The advantage of the production is manifestly the great beauty of the sets, the lovely contrast between the Moorish-inspired architecture and the 1960s costumes, and the remarkably detailed personen-regie ensuring that the characters were both brilliantly realised and finely in period. And it was both very funny and rather touching.
Davide Luciano - Le nozze di Figaro - Glyndebourne - photo Robbie Jack |
But thinking about the production, as the performances from Davide Luciano as Figaro, and Rosa Feola as Susanna were so strong, it was as if Michael Grandage and Ian Rutherford were refocussing the dramaturgy slightly, making the servants the stronger, more dominant characters as the feckless aristocrats play on around them.
It helped that both Luciano and Feola are native Italian speakers, so that the opening scene had great strength and vitality in their use of language. Luciano's strong, rather virile performance reminded me that in the original play Figaro had a number of Revolutionary sentiments (which were stripped out by librettist Lorenzo da Ponte). Here was a Figaro less the charmer and more the schemer, quick to jealousy and full of passion. Luciano's musical performance was to match, singing with a sense of a strong line and with a feeling of suppressed anger. Rosa Feola as Susanna was poised and elegant, again with an inner strength combined with suppleness of line. You felt that Feola could have easily taken on the role of the Countess, and her account of Deh vieni gave us some of the finest singing of the evening.
Natalia Kawalek, Rosa Feola - Le nozze di FigaroGlyndebourne - photo Robbie Jack |
Natalia Kawalek was a piece of relatively late casting as Cherubino. Kawalek made a wonderfully convincing youth, and her impulsively sulking performance really helped ground the drama in the naturalism which Grandage clearly desired. Musically she seemed to take some time to warm up, and Non so piu seemed to lack the sort of relaxed refulgence of tone which is ideal in this role, though Voi che sapete was sung with great charm.
Susan Bickley, Alasdair Elliott, Gyula Orendt, Carlo Lepore, Rosa Feola, Davide Luciano - Le nozze di Figaro - Glyndebourne - photo Robbie Jack |
The smaller roles were all strongly taken with Alasdair Elliott as Don Curzio, Nicholas Folwell as Antonio, and Julia Hamon and Alison Langer as the bridesmaids. Like the rest of the cast, the chorus clearly had great fun with the 1960s visual details of the production, and helped to bring the ensemble scenes alive. Though I have to confess that I found the choreography (originally by Ben Wright and revived by Kieran Sheehan) relied a little too much on fitting 1960s dance moves to period music, a trope that can easily weary.
From the opening notes of the overture, Jonathan Cohen and the Orchestra of the Age of Enlightenment gave us a crisply vivid account of the score. Cohen used the period instruments to keep the textures light, yet vivid, and to allow the music to move without seeming overly rushed. Individual numbers were shaped finely, but there was an over-arching sense to the performance too, matching Grandage's desire to have the action move seamlessly through the day. There was some lovely continuo playing from Ashok Gupta (forte piano) and Jonathan Manson (cello), responsive and imaginative without overly drawing attention to itself.
All concerned brought out that combination of pathos, humour and tragedy which is the work's hallmark, and if the great moments did not quite move us as much as they could, overall this was a vividly engaging production, with a cast of beautifully realised characters.
This review appears in OperaToday.com
Elsewhere on this blog:
- Sexily seductive: Henk Neven & Hans Eijsackers are dreaming of Spain - CD review
- Bringing David Jones' vision to musical life: Iain Bell's In Parenthesis - Opera review
- Scorching performances, grey production: Nabucco at Covent Garden - Opera review
- Stunning: Stephen McNeff's Banished at Trinity Laban - opera review
- Two visionaries: Stockhausen & Scriabin from Vanessa Benelli Mosell - CD review
- Short & bitter-sweet: Yaniv d'Or at the Wigmore Hall - concert review
- Filling the shoes of Handel's favourite tenor: Where'er you walk from Allan Clayton, Ian Page & Classical Opera - CD review
- Emotional punch: Puccini's La fanciulla del West at Grange Park Opera - opera review
- Grandeur and intimacy: Verdi's Don Carlo at Grange Park Opera - opera review
- Youthful ensemble: Young artists La Boheme at Opera Holland Park - opera review
- Real ensemble: Jenufa at the London Coliseum - opera review
- Elegant and intense: Mozart's Idomeneo at Garsington - opera review
- Home
No comments:
Post a Comment